2026-03-03 Eclipse

-

 

Haven't used my camera in a while.
Now I'm fumbling with the settings.
🤣 😱 

I'm a newbie again!
🔰  

1/640
F16
ISO 400
Canon 550D
70-200F7L @ 188mm


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Moon shot by rom flores

-
Image
My first try at a moon shot. Done with a 70-200 F4 L lens. This is a 100% crop of the image. Not enough resolution to be printed. Saw on the internet several shots like this. Upon capturing it on my own, I said, ugh, this is nowhere near their result. But I soon enough found out that the result was due to heavy sharpening in post process. This was processed in Digital Photo Professional. F8 1/200 s ISO 100 /rom
Read more

Amazing Nikonians

-
Image
Nikon users are a very passionate group. They are extremely loyal to the brand. When I visit brand independent photography forums, you can immediately see their fanaticism. They have the Nikon logo in their avatars. They would try to convince you that the Nikon brand is the way to go. They'll immediately pounce on newbies asking for opinion and will almost try to convince them that the Nikon D40, which doesn't even autofocus the nifty fifty lens, is better than a Canon 5D (well at least the Canon 400D). They always say that the Nikon images are better straight out of the camera. I have yet to see this proven. All side by side image comparisons I've seen have so subtle difference. They project the Nikon as "the other" brand which appeals to the underdog lovers. They project it as the "darkside" which appeals to the villain lovers. They project it as the more popular camera as it is used at movies and TV shows such as CSI and spiderman. They...
Read more

Better equipment = better pics?

-
Image
It's the indian not the pana. In plain english, it translates to: It's the indian, not the bow and arrow. Or, it's the photographer that matters, not the camera being used. Look at the two photographs. Which is better or more appealing? The first photograph is taken with a better equipment while the second one was taken using a point and shoot camera. Some things you lack in skill, you compensate with technology. * Shaky hands? there's Image Stabilizer. * Difficulty telling if the subject is in focus? Auto focus and focus assist beam. * Better and faster focus ability. * Better low light ability. * Lesser incidents of red eye. * Lower noise levels. Better equipment is simply better. A point and shoot in the hands of an able photographer will yield better than pro equipment in the hands of an amateur. But if a point and shoot camera and an SLR is used by the same person (or same skill level), the pro equipment will definitely produce instantly better results. In conclusi...
Read more